Cost Reduction by Improvements of Waste Gas Treatment at an Silicon Thin Film Solar Cell Mass Production Line

Due to the pressure for cost reduction in a thinfilm PV production line an effort to reduce the running cost of the waste gas treatment systems was started. As a precondition the DRE (Destruction Removal Efficiency) should not be reduced. Intended improvements for maintenance and media consumptions were tested on-site under production conditions over a 6 month time frame.

Figure 1: Point-of-use abatement concept for Thin Film PV production line
Figure 1: Point-of-use abatement concept for Thin Film PV production line

Overview of the thinfilm PV production line at Baoding Tianwei

The a-Si/μc-Si CVD-process tools use large amounts of SiH4, H2, NF3 and TMB, PH3 as doping gases. The process gases are pyrophoric, explosive or harmful to the environment. Therefore the process exhaust is treated by combustion and wet scrubbing point-of-use abatements in connection with wet electrostatic dust collectors. Each day approximately 100 kg of SiO2 dust and 180 kg of HF are generated and retained in the abatement systems. The exhaust gases from the TCO tools contain DEZ, ZnO particles and hydrocarbons. Each TCO tool is connected to a burn/wet waste gas treatment system which oxidizes combustible compounds and retains particles.

Cost Reduction Maintenance: Main causes and achieved improvements

KAI - Waste gas treatment with GIANT/EDC

  • Particle deposits in the reactor and connection pipe to electrostatic dust collector
    - Deposits in the reactor were much less than expected → maintenance
      interval extended
    - Added a self-cleaning and maintenance free prefilter to the connecting
      pipe → no more maintenance of the connection pipe required  
  • Sedimentation of particles in the circuit tank → prevented by increased circulation/agitation of the washing fluid
  • Salt scaling turned out the main cause of problems → completely eliminated by small changes in the tank
Figure 2: Scheduled Maintenance Time
Figure 2: Scheduled Maintenance Time

ESCAPE - Maintenance intervals before beginning of testing: same as for TCO tools

  • Observed very small particle deposits during maintenance
  • Measure: maintenance intervals extended
  • Result: no negative impact on uptime

Utility Savings at point-of-use waste gas treatment

Waste Gas Treatment System GIANT

  • Optimization of pH regime → reduced lye consumption
  • Prevention of sedimentation and improved filtration of the scrubbing liquid → higher concentration of particles in the liquid possible, reduced water consumption
Figure 3: Utility Consumption
Figure 3: Utility Consumption

Waste Gas Treatment System ESCAPE

  • Reduced water consumption → no negative impact

Conclusion Cost Reductions

Based on simple but consequent improvements the running costs of the waste gas treatment systems can be reduced significantly.

Looking for Further Information?

If you would like to get in contact with us, please use the following email form or simply call us.

+1 844 862-1662Give us a call! We are looking forward to providing a further information on our products for waste gas treatment.